Reducing the amount of start points.

SheetCam related questions and tips can be posted here
Post Reply
Creative25
2.5 Star Member
2.5 Star Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:07 am

Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by Creative25 »

I am cutting small letters out of a 10 mm plate.
My problem is that the nozzle wears badly during pearcing.
So I would like to reduce the amount of starts.
First cut the holes in the closed letters o e R etc. Then cut the outside of all the letters without the torch turning off.
Is there a function on Sheetcam that can do this or do I need to modify the drawings?
IMG_1100.jpeg
IMG_1102.jpeg
User avatar
djreiswig
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 2075
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:02 pm
Location: SE Nebraska

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by djreiswig »

In operation set the maximum chain length to something large and it should chain cut. Not sure if it will cut all inside cuts first or not.
2014 Bulltear (StarLab) 4x8
C&CNC EtherCut
Mach3, SheetCam, Draftsight
Hypertherm PM65
Oxy/Acetylene Flame Torch
Pneumatic Plate Marker, Ohmic, 10 inch Rotary Chuck (in progress)
User avatar
sheetcamCS2
1.5 Star Member
1.5 Star Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:08 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by sheetcamCS2 »

In the Jet Operation window, see 'Max chain length'. Chaining keeps the torch on and down between shape cuts. See Help on the topic also.
Also combine it's use with a small negative 'overcut' (aka undercut), suitable lead in and lead out, and cut path 'shortest path' for auto toolpath layout which should approximate your intentions. You can always edit the start points to further facilitate chaining of shape cuts.
In this example, the toolpath was auto layout, that is no edited start points.
Screenshot 2025-05-05 070452.png
adbuch
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 11366
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:22 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by adbuch »

djreiswig wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 6:58 am In operation set the maximum chain length to something large and it should chain cut. Not sure if it will cut all inside cuts first or not.
:Like :Like :Like
Creative25
2.5 Star Member
2.5 Star Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:07 am

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by Creative25 »

Thanks
So the function I was looking for is the chain function that seems pretty simple.
What does the function undercut -0.5 do?
I’m thinking of moving the holes in the letters to another layer so I can have the correct lead ins.
Does Sheetcam have a function to start leading for holes in the center?
User avatar
sheetcamCS2
1.5 Star Member
1.5 Star Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:08 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by sheetcamCS2 »

Creative25 wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 1:28 pm What does the function undercut -0.5 do?
Because I used perpendicular leadin and leadout, it keeps them from overlapping, so the arc is well fed through the whole toolpath. I chose perpendicular to give sheetcam a good chance at auto gen the toolpath in this circumstance, however other styles may work fine also, I didn't try them.
Creative25 wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 1:28 pm Does Sheetcam have a function to start leading for holes in the center?
yes it does, on that same Operation window (at bottom) and also on Tool definition window, the Operation values will override the Tool def values.

Here is some good new user info to read and videos to watch- https://forum.sheetcam.com/t/where-to-l ... cam/8102/2
and here- https://forum.sheetcam.com/t/toolset-pr ... ricks/8281
User avatar
djreiswig
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 2075
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:02 pm
Location: SE Nebraska

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by djreiswig »

Does Sheetcam have a function to start leading for holes in the center?
yes it does, on that same Operation window (at bottom) and also on Tool definition window, the Operation values will override the Tool def values.
I assumed the start in center of holes only worked on circles, and not the irregular internal shapes in his drawing.
2014 Bulltear (StarLab) 4x8
C&CNC EtherCut
Mach3, SheetCam, Draftsight
Hypertherm PM65
Oxy/Acetylene Flame Torch
Pneumatic Plate Marker, Ohmic, 10 inch Rotary Chuck (in progress)
User avatar
sheetcamCS2
1.5 Star Member
1.5 Star Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:08 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by sheetcamCS2 »

djreiswig wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 10:20 pm I assumed the start in center of holes only worked on circles, and not the irregular internal shapes in his drawing
Your assumption is correct, only for holes which are true circles. I had equated "holes" to "circles" in my former reply, good point that you clarified that.

TMI warning... I only mention this because it can be a serious 'head scratcher' when sheetcam doesn't recognize a circle.
While we're on the topic of circles as holes, it's worth noting that sheetcam has more than one algorithm to recognize holes as circles for center starting vs. drilling. I was advised by Les some time ago that dxf files (polylines) can present a more accurate arc in the drawing for such recognition than do svg files w bezier curves or b-splines. This can vary by CAD, CAD settings, size of circle, and sheetcam settings (menu Options-'Application options'-'Drawing import'). I have used dxf files ever since with near 100% success of circle recognition, the exceptions being when polyline arc tolerance settings are seemingly out of sync between CAD and sheetcam, usually due to a settings reset or some other inadvertent settings change. In sheetcam, see 'max detail reduction error' in the settings window cited above.

An example of the same when CAD exports dxf is best described here as 'curve tolerance' - https://docs.lightburnsoftware.com/1.7/ ... t-settings, with attribution to Lightburn sw.
Screenshot 2025-05-06 083230.png
adbuch
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 11366
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:22 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by adbuch »

sheetcamCS2 wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 8:46 am
djreiswig wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 10:20 pm I assumed the start in center of holes only worked on circles, and not the irregular internal shapes in his drawing
Your assumption is correct, only for holes which are true circles. I had equated "holes" to "circles" in my former reply, good point that you clarified that.

TMI warning... I only mention this because it can be a serious 'head scratcher' when sheetcam doesn't recognize a circle.
While we're on the topic of circles as holes, it's worth noting that sheetcam has more than one algorithm to recognize holes as circles for center starting vs. drilling. I was advised by Les some time ago that dxf files (polylines) can present a more accurate arc in the drawing for such recognition than do svg files w bezier curves or b-splines. This can vary by CAD, CAD settings, size of circle, and sheetcam settings (menu Options-'Application options'-'Drawing import'). I have used dxf files ever since with near 100% success of circle recognition, the exceptions being when polyline arc tolerance settings are seemingly out of sync between CAD and sheetcam, usually due to a settings reset or some other inadvertent settings change. In sheetcam, see 'max detail reduction error' in the settings window cited above.

An example of the same when CAD exports dxf is best described here as 'curve tolerance' - https://docs.lightburnsoftware.com/1.7/ ... t-settings, with attribution to Lightburn sw.
Screenshot 2025-05-06 083230.png
:Like :Like :Like
Creative25
2.5 Star Member
2.5 Star Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:07 am

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by Creative25 »

Thanks that clarifies a lot.
So it would be better to add the lead ins for letters as straight lines and change the length till it is more or less in the middle.

Now a have another question.
I am planning to mark the start points of the inside cuts first. Plasmac has an option pierce only.
I was thinking of using this function with a very low pierce delay say 0.05 seconds. Then drill holes. So in the end I can do the cutting with edge starts only.

Will this work?
Or will the mark be hardened to such an extent that drilling will be difficult?
User avatar
djreiswig
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
4.5 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 2075
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:02 pm
Location: SE Nebraska

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by djreiswig »

What plasma cutter are you using? On thicker material I've had good luck using a ramp pierce. Set the plunge rate the same as the feed rate. This tends to shoot the junk behind the torch rather than up into it. I've cut a fair amount of 1/2" this way.
2014 Bulltear (StarLab) 4x8
C&CNC EtherCut
Mach3, SheetCam, Draftsight
Hypertherm PM65
Oxy/Acetylene Flame Torch
Pneumatic Plate Marker, Ohmic, 10 inch Rotary Chuck (in progress)
adbuch
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 11366
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:22 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by adbuch »

Creative25 wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 1:03 pm Thanks that clarifies a lot.
So it would be better to add the lead ins for letters as straight lines and change the length till it is more or less in the middle.

Now a have another question.
I am planning to mark the start points of the inside cuts first. Plasmac has an option pierce only.
I was thinking of using this function with a very low pierce delay say 0.05 seconds. Then drill holes. So in the end I can do the cutting with edge starts only.

Will this work?
Or will the mark be hardened to such an extent that drilling will be difficult?
Yes - I think pre-drilling your pierce points will work fine, and will most likely extend your consumable life vs. doing actual pierces in that thick material.

David
Creative25
2.5 Star Member
2.5 Star Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:07 am

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by Creative25 »

djreiswig wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 7:13 am What plasma cutter are you using? On thicker material I've had good luck using a ramp pierce. Set the plunge rate the same as the feed rate. This tends to shoot the junk behind the torch rather than up into it. I've cut a fair amount of 1/2" this way.
I have a power max 45 do to insufficient electricity I can only cut at 35 amps else the voltage on the supply line drops too much and the plasma cutter cuts off and gives a warning. With 35 amps on a 10mm sheet it takes 2 seconds to Pearce through.
adbuch
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
6 Star Elite Contributing Member
Posts: 11366
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:22 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Reducing the amount of start points.

Post by adbuch »

Creative25 wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 12:22 pm
djreiswig wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 7:13 am What plasma cutter are you using? On thicker material I've had good luck using a ramp pierce. Set the plunge rate the same as the feed rate. This tends to shoot the junk behind the torch rather than up into it. I've cut a fair amount of 1/2" this way.
I have a power max 45 do to insufficient electricity I can only cut at 35 amps else the voltage on the supply line drops too much and the plasma cutter cuts off and gives a warning. With 35 amps on a 10mm sheet it takes 2 seconds to Pearce through.
:Like :Like :Like
Post Reply

Return to “SheetCam”